Schematic of current park from Montgomery Parks presentation.*

About 30 people attended a meeting Tuesday to review the latest options for a $1.5 million project to improve the Silver Spring Intermediate Neighborhood Park.

The 3.6-acre park is on the site of the former Silver Spring Intermediate School. It is still owned by the school system, but is managed by Montgomery Parks, which installed the parking lot, basketball court, tennis court, ball fields and playground in the 1980s.

The park bordered by Philadelphia, Chicago and Boston avenues, along with single-family homes, and is across from the Silver Spring/Takoma Park campus of Montgomery College.

Project Manager Wen Huang first reviewed some of the park’s current issues, identified by staff and by the public at an April meeting on the project. Those weaknesses include:

  • Poor drainage of fields and the tennis courts
  • Decaying and crumbling retaining walls with unsafe guardrails
  • Park entrances not ADA compliant
  • Underutilized parking area
  • Invasive plants and erosion issues
  • Lack of connection between the playground and the rest of the park, and
  • Limited seating.

She noted that comments from the April meeting and submitted online demonstrated that residents most valued the rolling, open play area, the canopy of mature trees, and the general character of the park itself, which most commenters want to preserve.

Two options were presented at the initial meeting for attendees and online commenters to react to, and the general consensus showed the lack of desire for amenities such as a dog-walking trail, formal playing fields, exercise stations, or a loop trail.

Prior to introducing the latest four options for park improvements, Huang briefly turned the presentation over to Michael Ma, Montgomery Parks park development division chief. Ma reminded the attendees that the county manages more than 400 parks. Therefore, once a park is renovated, it may not be revisited for as many as 30 or 40 years, he said.

For that reason, staff tries to look ahead at future populations and their needs, and build in as much flexibility as possible with any new improvements.

Huang said no matter what options go into the final plan, some general improvements will be made. Those would include:

  • ADA accessibility to all parts of the park
  • Eliminating unneeded parking spaces in favor of green space
  • Adding fixed tables and seating
  • Adding a fence to the playground area, and higher fencing around the courts
  • Releveling and resurfacing the tennis courts, possibly restriping to include pickleball court areas
  • Repairing or replacing retaining walls and guardrails, and
  • Improving storm water management and erosion control.

Option #1 was presented as the least radical change by, in addition to the above, adding walkways and executing a decorative concept to the wall along Boston Avenue.

The next three options added more and more amenities. Option #2 would move the current walkway to provide a sledding hill, add an entrance with seating near the intersection of Chicago and Boston, and create a boardwalk and mural wall while improving field drainage.

Option #3 would be similar but not add a new entrance. It would add seating and a more direct access to the playground, flatten the grading of the open space, and provide more play space.

Option #4 offered the most extensive changes, including some that were not necessarily the most popular ideas. Those amenities could include:

  • Overflow parking and a bike rack
  • A drinking fountain
  • A shelter near the playground
  • Converting the tennis courts to multipurpose courts for pickleball and small-scale soccer
  • Exercise stations, and
  • “Natural” play areas with static or dynamic elements such boulders, etc.

After the four options were presented, attendees were given stickers to mark their preferences for (green stickers) or against (red stickers) the options, as well as specific amenities.

The presentation with those options will be online at the project web page for public review and comment shortly, with the idea of coming to some community consensus on improvements to be made.

Once that is achieved, which staff hopes will be this summer, the design phase will begin. The Planning Board would then get the design for its approval this winter. If granted, construction could start in the fall of 2019 and the new park open in 2020.

* P=Parking, BB=Basketball courts, T=Tennis courts, PG=Playground

Attendees mark their preferred options and amenities for the park improvements. Photo by Mike Diegel.

Residents Review Latest Options for $1.5 Million Park Project

Follow Source of the Spring on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Sign up for our free Weekly Newsletter here. Submit events to our Community Events Calendar here. Please send tips and questions through our News Tips form, or email [email protected]

Learn how to support Source of the Spring here.

See something around town? Tag your photos on Twitter & Instagram with #SourceShots.

Residents Review Latest Options for $1.5 Million Park Project

Residents Review Latest Options for $1.5 Million Park Project

Mike Diegel

Co-Founder/Editor at Source of the Spring
Mike Diegel, a founding member of Source of the Spring, is a Silver Spring advocate who has been appointed by the county executive to several committees and task forces. He currently is a member of the Silver Spring Arts & Entertainment District Advisory Committee. His background is in journalism and he earned a bachelor of arts in communications from McDaniel College. He is self-employed as a communications consultant and is an active volunteer with Appalachian Great Pyrenees Rescue. He has lived for more than 20 years in Northwood/Four Corners with his wife Trish and multiple Great Pyrenees dogs. He is better known around Silver Spring as the Guy with the Big White Dogs.
Residents Review Latest Options for $1.5 Million Park Project

Latest posts by Mike Diegel (see all)

  •  
    14
    Shares
  • 4
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •